All posts by daniel furr

A free press is fundamental to a democracy

by People's Republic of Kent Monday, July 11 2011

 

The vultures are circling; the press is the enemy within. I will not regurgitate the allegations about the News of the World or the rumours surrounding other newspapers, this has been recycled for the last 72 hours; nor will articulate the political fallout – both David Cameron and Ed Miliband hired former News International employees (both have allegations about them). And Labour and Tories were both guests at a recent dinner party, hosted by Murdoch.

Instead, I wish to raise one point. The press in general. Limited reports are suggesting ordinary journalists are witnessing hostility from the public. Andrew Gilligan noted a wave of e-mails, criticising his work and abilities as a journalists, something he has never witnessed. According to Mr Gilligan he is not the only journalist to experience this.

McCarthyism-esque inquiries will damage our reputation as a democracy – a free press is fundamental to holding the government to account. Regulation on their abilities to conduct investigation journalism would be a disaster for Britain. Yes, the hacking scandal was immoral, but it was a failure of the criminal justice system. It was the Metropolitan Police which warned against a public inquiry and turned a blind eye to criminality at a variety of news papers.

Let's not throw the baby out with the bath water. You might find the press irritating. But as Edmund Burke elegantly pointed out, the press are the fourth estate and the true guardians of liberty.

Tags:
Categories: Conservatives | Crime | democracy | Labour | Liberal Democrats | Media | Police | Politics

GUEST POST: Environmental disaster won’t disappear.

by People's Republic of Kent Wednesday, June 8 2011

The first of the new guest post feature. Liam Batch, A Level politics student from Kent, writes about the lack of environmental discussion by our political leaders.

 

With issues cropping up in recent years such as the recession, civil unrest in Libya and Egypt, controversy over wiki-leaks and the infamous ash cloud which to their credit, are all topics that cannot be understated in their importance, it appears however that one topic is slowly disappearing away from both the political agenda, and from the headlines.

The state of the environment has been subject to much anxiety and concern in previous years, but has the issue progressed into becoming a fundamental element of Party’s manifesto’s? The subject appears to have noticeably declined in recent months, and for one reason or another, nothing substantial appears to be getting done.

Anthony Downs once created a ‘five stage model’ in which he outlines the five stages in which public interest gains and loses mobility in the event of a monumental crises. Number four of the cycle is the ‘gradual decline of intense public interest’ which has substantial resonance to the situation we face today. With the complexity and cost attached to this environmental disaster we face, public interest has inevitably plummeted and progress is racing along at a snail’s pace. One possible answer is the style of politics within the UK which unfortunately sees politicians focussed on the short term issues which will ultimately win an election, and not the long term goals which will not be completed within a five year term in Governance. Gone are the days of the selfless politician, they are indisputably a dying breed of few who are here to represent the people, and are not conversely fixated upon getting as far as they can climb up the political ladder, professional politicians as they are often labelled. The competitive nature of British politics has blinkered those we elect away from actually solving the monumental problems of the world, and instead merely doing what is necessary to insure power is sustained.

Last month, the BBC reported that Global Carbon emissions have reached an all time high and were recorded 5% higher than the previous recording in 2008. We are too often manipulated in to believing by Cameron and his cronies that ‘they are doing all they can to preserve the environment’, when in actual fact, it is sitting at the bottom of their agenda. A few weeks before the most recent general election, Conservative party leader David Cameron promised to limit new power plants to be as clean as a modern gas plant. However, shortly after the Election the Guardian reported than ministers were set to raise the amount of emissions that coal and other power plants were allowed to omit more into the atmosphere. How can politicians tell us to act more ecologically, when they are evidently at the height of anthropocentrism? To the Conservatives credit, they have already implemented one of their pre election promises by ensuring every household has access to a ‘green deal’ of up to £6,500 to improve energy efficiency. But is this enough? Is this really sufficient in the grander scheme of things, it is my view simply both a sweetener and an illusion designed to persuade the electorate that they are making substantial efforts to tackle the environmental problems we face.

However, this isn’t just a British problem, but a world problem as repetitively the efforts of many are stamped upon by World leaders at Earth summits where the Governments around the world are too busy weighing up the cost the proposals make to their economy rather than the cost they are causing to the Environment by doing nothing.

With resources scarce, and the Earth showing increasing signs of entropy each and every day, it is vital that Politicians wake up to the idea that action is needed, and needed quickly. It isn’t an issue that will disappear, and if action isn’t taken soon, the damage we are causing will be ultimately irreversible.

Tags:
Categories: blogs and bloggers | Councils | democracy | Economy | election | Environment | Local Politics | National Politics | Politics

Guest posts: Can YOU help?

by People's Republic of Kent Tuesday, June 7 2011

 

Pardon the period of exile. This humble blogger has been extremely busy with other personal projects. So, forgive me, I've neglected this blog quite a lot. But, this is significant platform for discussing local issues in Kent – especially those which effect you and I.

After careful consideration, I will be starting a guest feature for this blog. Rules are simple;

  1. Must be a resident of Kent.

  2. Guest posts needs to be relevant to the nature of this blog (.i.e politics)

  3. In line with the blogging T&C's of KentOnline.

  4. Needs to be appealing.

  5. Word length between 500 – 800 max.

If you would like the opportunity, please e-mail me (daniel at gmail.com)

Tags:
Categories: blogs and bloggers | Councils | democracy | General | Local Politics | National Politics | Politics | Protests

Regardless of the spin, Kent is still strongly blue.

by People's Republic of Kent Friday, May 6 2011

 

Well, the votes are in and counted. Kent has voted, it seems the turnout is up, and there has been a few changes. Predictably, the Liberal Democrat vote has capitulated in places (most notably Canterbury) and Labour has made gains.

Gravesham is a council Labour are championing this morning with a spectacular win, with Ed Miliband claiming ('the result proves' theory) his party 'are on the come back'. Alas, though; Dartford, Shepway and Medway have seen Labour fail to make any real gains; seats that were on the Labour target list. Conservatives have either maintained control or increased their representation. Thanet has fallen to No Overall Control (NOC), which is disappointing after Harriet Harmen and others visited this week. Labour failed to make, well, easy gains that they were expected to achieve.

Ed Miliband is touring the county and marching through the towns like a victorious Caesar, but it is covering up a modest night for Labour. And that is being kind. The infamous '+1,000 councillors easy' claim has proved to be false. The anti-cut message is not adequate due to Tory gains across the council. Cameron is the true winner in Kent.

More worrying, the Liberal Democrat vote did not move to Labour – it shows signs of the Tories benefiting. Canterbury, for example, has seen the Tories increase their councillors to over 30 with Labour (again) have no genuine presence on the council. Only 3 councillors.

Kent is still blue, and strongly blue, with a few spots of red and yellow.

note: Liberal Democrat leader at Canterbury City Council had this to say on twitter;

@ AlexCanterbury It was like sending your batsmen to the crease only for them to find their bats had been broken by the team captain #libdems

Tags:
Categories: Conservatives | democracy | dictators | election | Government | Labour | Liberal Democrats | Local Politics | National Politics | Police | Politics

A lonely moment for a republican

by People's Republic of Kent Thursday, April 28 2011

 

Since 23rd April 1661, the day Charles II became King and Monarchy was restored in England, have republicans felt ever so lonely. This will be quite the forlorn post filled with deep regret and sadness at the Royal Wedding.

I'm quite glad Kent has the lowest registered street parties tomorrow, thus my faith in humanity has been slightly restored, and we haven't gone over the top in plastic patriotism. The Union Flag (it is only called a 'Jack' when flown at sea) is a beautiful symbol and should be raised all the time, not just for the Monarchy.

But alas, Friday will be a depressing day for us republicans.

Tomorrow when the nations erupts into depressing exhilaration over the wedding, I shall ponder what Cromwell would've made of all this pomp and ceremony; as the Royal carriage passes his statue outside Parliament

Tags:
Categories: Crime | democracy | dictators | election | Family Life | Leisure | Moans and groans | Royal | Royalty | Work

No to congestion charge

by People's Republic of Kent Thursday, April 7 2011

 

As an asthma suffer I do have a keen interest in air quality and pollution. But Cllr Martin Vye of the Liberal Democrats, do you honestly think a congestion charge for major Kent towns is a solution to my problems?

People need cars in their daily lives. Fact. There is no viable alternative for them and the lack of investment in this countries infrastructure is not the fault of drivers; inexcusable apathy from countless governments are to blame. Kent has some of the worst roads in the whole United Kingdom and the neglection has gone on for far too long.

A congestion charge is not a solution to the problem. I'm still waiting to see the benefits in London, which has not lead to a psychological change in drivers. In fact, Ken Livingston was unpopular for wanting to expanding the charge to other regions of London. Subsquently went on to lose to Boris Johnson in the Mayoral elections. Manchester rejected the preporsal.

It is unpopular and completely unjustified.

 

Here's some alternatives:

 

  1. Improved road layouts

  2. Better junctions

  3. Ending the nightmare of poor town management

  4. Funding public transport and investing in sufficient vehicles.

 

The solution is not another tax for over taxed individuals.

Tags:
Categories: Commuting | Councils | democracy | dictators | Driving | Government | Health | Highways Agency | Local Politics | Planning | Politics | Transport

The European Union and Kent

by People's Republic of Kent Thursday, March 3 2011

 

Yesterday, I had the pleasure of being a guest on BBC Radio Kent to discuss immigration and its effects on the South East. When discussing our association to Europe and the freedom of movement of people, it seemed many in the county were quite sceptical to the EU.

I was informed, whilst on air, that countless e-mails were flooding in regarding EU membership and it does seem the majority in the county would vote to leave the EU, if given a chance. Due to the debate being about immigration, I was unable to expand further. Why would you, if you're in favour, vote to leave the European Union? Is it just due to immigration or the undemocratic nature of the organisation?

Note: I truly apologies for the lack of blogging lately – I've been rather busy with other projects and medical problems, too. I'm trying to manage everything more coherently, seeing I do have another blog and other freelance work, too.

Tags: , ,
Categories: democracy | dictators | Local Politics | Moans and groans | National Politics | Politics

Potholes here, there and everywhere

by People's Republic of Kent Thursday, January 27 2011

 

I could literally write endless pages on my frustration about potholes. A truly horrifying, shocking and an utter damnation of Kent County Council. Last night I had the pleasure of talking to the Liberal Democrat Leader at Canterbury Council, Alex Perkins, and he is appalled by the state of our roads. Alex is conducting a crusade on twitter and gathering examples (from residents) of potholes in Canterbury and documenting them.

Local businesses are the significant voices on this subject. I'm not aware of the cost to the local economy, but I assume it is quite significant.

However, from experience, it seems the back roads are among the most neglected. Especially Stour Street in Canterbury. KCC are promising the problem is being dealt with and these are not among the worse roads in the United Kingdom. But I beg to differ. In fact, I am willing for readers to contact me via twitter or facebook and actually send me photographs are potholes across the country – in order to highlight the neglectful attitudes towards roads.

Tags:
Categories: CCTV | Commuting | Driving | Economy | Employment | Environment | KCC | Local Politics | Moans and groans | Work

The Thought Police march on

by People's Republic of Kent Tuesday, January 25 2011

 

SKY have once again made the headlines for the wrong reasons. The dynamic duo of Andy Gray and Richard Keys have been suspended for sexiest remarks regarding a female linesmen during the Wolves V Liverpool on Saturday. The pair made stereotypical, immature comments about women in football and their allege inability to understand the offside rule – which has been a running joke for many football related comedy sketches. For decades.

All the private remarks were recorded on a mobile phone, not SKY's sound equipment, and released to the media. Mr Gray and Keys thought they were having a private conversation, but these men passionately support modernisation of the game and probably should never of made those remarks in audience and vulnerability of being recorded. In other words, the two should know much better. For the record, I don't agree with their opinion. Players might respect female officials more because any abusive language, or behaviour, will face strict sanctions from the FA

However, I protest at several opinions and responses to this controversy. Especially the argument of “illegal” and “its offence to hold such thoughts.” That, ladies and gentlemen, is the basic premise to creating a thought police; prosecuting an individual for thinking. None of us our holier than thou and should never proclaim to be, but society should not impose a sense of morality or a mandate for legitimate conscious. It is violation of individual sovereignty to do so. There is a limit to political correctness.

When you start criminalising freedom of conscious and the ability to think, we start to slide into a very dark abyss. It might start off innocent in a moral crusade, but you could end up prosecuting individuals for political opinions. And that is the foundation of a totalitarian society.

Andy Gray and Richard Keys need to become more professional and less puerile. Not burned at the stake.

Tags:
Categories: Crime | Family Life | Football | General | History | Police | Showbiz | Work

There was life before EMA and will be after it's gone.

by People's Republic of Kent Wednesday, January 19 2011

As a once humble student I claimed EMA, whilst studying at Canterbury college. My working class background enabled me to be entitled for financial assistance to make education more accessible to me. But, majority of the money was not required for my education – truthfully, I did not really need it after all. I'm not afraid to confess (and I am not the only one) whose EMA went towards social activities. Only educational related item was transportation – only because my then girlfriend lived in Thanet. And this is not made clear at the start because you felt almost encouraged to apply for EMA when enrolling.

After a year, I decided a part time job was much more adequate for my requirements because the government grant was not beneficial to my circumstances. I was better off working. And this is the problem with EMA: the money is never truly needed in most cases. And I find it very hard to feel sympathy towards “#savema” tweets on twitter – being sent from Blackberry's and iPhones. If you can afford a luxury item of expenditure – you are not poor.

It would be much more productive to provide a voucher system – for stationary and travelling, instead of indiscriminately allocating assistance to anyone. Especially to individuals who did not really need it. If we isolate the waste and unnecessary cases then the poorer students can be financed more generously. Instead of £30 a week.

The current system is grossly expensive and ineffective. There is nothing wrong with those aged between 16-18 being encouraged to take part-time jobs because, after all, this country has high youth unemployment. We, as a society, should not be fuelling dependency.

Tags:
Categories: Business | Economy | Education | Employment | Moans and groans | National Politics | Politics | Schools | Work | ema

People's Republic of Kent

Daniel Furr is a freelance writer and blogger, commenting on political affairs of national politics and its effects on Kent. A resident of Canterbury and highly opinionated

from a liberal point of view. When not blogging, I tweet, bake and drink tea. Feel free to contact me via Twitter or Facebook.


Subscribe to People's Republic of Kent's Blog
My Social Networks

Got a bee in your bonnet?

Bloggy BeeIf you have a voice, and would like it to be heard, why not consider writing a blog for our site?

Click here to send us a message and let us know!

Welcome to our blogs!

Our Blogs

Tag cloud

Topics of Conversation