All posts tagged 'puma'

It's just a 'big' cat...

by Big cat sightings in Kent, by Neil Arnold Thursday, April 19 2012

Left - domestic cat photographed at Sussex.Over the last two days I've conducted two lectures to more than 300 people, and it's always amazing how many people come forward to report sightings of 'big cats' that otherwise they would have kept quiet. Witnesses come from all walks of life but it does help when someone who sees a 'big cat' has had some experience with differing species of cat. One chap came forward to say that a few years ago whilst walking at Pembury he'd seen a black leopard - I completely trusted his opinion as he'd worked with leopards many years ago. In the last few weeks there have been sightings of lynx and leopard from varying parts of Kent - Longfield (lynx), Dartford (black leopard), Sjeppey (black leopard), Sevenoaks (lynx) and Hempstead, near Gillingham (black leopard), Sitingbourne (black leopard) and in most cases I could say that I trusted the witnesses and their descriptions. However, it must be said that not all witnesses know what they are seeing, and too many times photographs and blurry film footga eof alleged 'big cats' makes its way onto websites and into newspapers when the reality is the images clearly show nothing more than domestic cats. This is very frutrating. I recall a few years ago one of the reputable (!) tabloids featured a photo on its front page of an alleged 'big cat' perched on a wall, whilst several cows grazed near it. The paper at the time claimed the photo showed the 'beast of Bodmin' and yet anyone with half a brain could tell it was a domestic cat - the shortness of the tail, the small pointed ears 9which happened to be close together), the short legs etc, etc. This happens all the time, and time and time again it allows the sceptics to make a mockery of decent research.

I present here a handful of images taken by people who claimed they'd seen a 'big cat' - naturally, some people will have genuine misinterpretations of dogs, feral cats, foxes etc, but the first image, taken at Jevington, Sussex, a few years ago, is interesting because the witness was adamant he'd photographed a black leopard. The photo made the local newspaper and yet clearly shows a domestic cat - even from a domestic cat anyone with a good eye should be able to tell the different between a leopard and a domestic cat - even a leopard cub shouldn't be confused with a domestic cat. The leopard has a long, curving tail, rounded ears, a muscular frame, especially in the shoulder and measures between 4 - 7 feet in length. Even a large domestic cat cannot match the description of a 'big cat'.

Left - the 'blob' of Sheppey - a domestic cat.The next image was taken at Sheppey not long ago, and I don't blame the witnesses for photographing it. The image shows a black dot in the distance, sitting at the edge of a field, stalking prey, but again, despite being a poor photo it does not show a black leopard. Also, another image more recently was passed around varying sources after someone claimed to have photographed the 'beast of Essex' and yet once again it is simply an unusual species of domestic cat. Whilst there are known to be smaller exotic cats in the UK - such as leopard cat, jungle cat, ocelot, and possibly caracal, and even jaguarundi, the photographs that appear in numerous papers etc, clearly do not show anything remotely exotic. It baffles me why newspapers etc use such images. Last year a paper down in East Kent sent me several photographs of a 'black cat' slinking along a street in the early hours of a morning. The reporter asked me what I thought about the "interesting photo's" andI just burst out laughing. The photo's clearly showed a domestic ca, nothing more nothing less, and yet several members of staff at the paper were sure this was a big cat. I get so many photo's sent to me by people who claim they've photographed 'big cats', and 99% of the time the images are of domestic animals, nearly always a moggy skulking along the edge of a field. Last year I visited a lady in Northfleet after she phoned me to say she'd photographed a puma in her back garden. I refuse to gte excited about any call until I fully investigate further, and in most cases photo's, and even a lot of sightings turn out to be nothing. Even so, I travelled to Northfleet and chatted with the lovely lady who showed me where in her garden this 'puma' had been and then she produced the photo - a domestic cat, albeit a rather matted loking one, sitting on a paving slab in her garden. The paving slab, in length, measured about 12 inches, hardly a monster cat! I asked the woman if she knew what a puma was, and she said, "Yes, that's one in the photo!"

Left - the 'beast of Essex' - simply an unusual species of domestic.I'm sure to this day she still has the photo and probably tells her family and friends it's a big cat and that I was mad for dismissing it, but as I always say to people, regarding 'big cat' evidence, you have to eliminate everything else first before considering 'big cat'. Another image I was sent came from a Mr Owens and reported seeing an unual spotted cat roaming around the outside of his property at Goudhurst. When he sent the photo I was amazed to see a lovely Bengal Cat. The striking markings, long tail, and muscular shoulder didn't suggest a 'big cat' but certainly an expensive pet that had obviously escaped from somewhere. The Bengal Cat is hybrid of domestic cat and leopard cat, and is a formidable predator in the wild but will be more than happy to show itself to humans. Nowadays such cats are kept as pets, and other forms of smaller exotic cats are also doing the rounds, some costing around £12,000! Not the sort of animal you'd want to escape from your house.

One must always remember that on too many occasions ohotographs that appear in newspapers or on internet sites and even on the news, are dubious to say the least, and if such an animal doesn't look like a leopard then it most likely isn't. It's always great to receive photographs of posisble 'big cats' and their evidence, but always try to get some type of scale when photographing animals from a distance, don't just take one photo, and if you can, try to approach, or at least, if the animal moves out of sight, go to the area and get a photo of you standing there, to judge height etc. Only recently film footage showing an alleged 'big cat' at Gloucestershire was palstered all over the main news (even though the footage was taken over a year previous) and to prove it was a 'big cat' the local researcher visited the area with a cardboard cut-out of what I presume was meant to be a 'big cat' although it looked like a deformed domestic cat. These are the sort of problems in judging scale etc, but hopefully the photo's I've presented here will give you an idea of what not to look for! Below, beautiful Bengal cat photographed in Kent in 2009.

 

 

 

 

Do 'big cats' eat Easter bunnies ?!

by Big cat sightings in Kent, by Neil Arnold Monday, April 9 2012

The Easter period has been extremely busy regarding reported sightings of what the newspapers like to call 'big cats'. I'm sure the sceptics and detractors will be eager to give this post a 1 star out 5 rating, but these blog posts are merely being put out there for the interest of those interested, and the sceptics who wish to learn more.

In the last four days there have been sightings of black leopard at Aylesford, Harrietsham, Sheppey, and Ashford - unlikely to be one solitary cat doing the rounds, crossing strong rivers etc. There IS more than one black leopard prowling Kent and yet I recently watched a hilarious interview with a zoo keeper who stated categorically that if there were leopards roaming England then there'd be slaughtered livestock everywhere. What complete rubbish. Leopards could easily survive on a diet of rabbit 9there'd be no remains either), pheasants, pigeons, and deer, we know this because of the scat we've found consisting of deer fur etc. In 2001 I worked with Chris Packham. Now, I'm of the opinion that Mr Packham may, deep down, believe that there are puma and lynx roaming the UK, and yet when they interviewed a 'big cat' keeper down at Marwell Zoo, the guy dismissed sightings of leopard in the UK, stating there was no evidence. It's rather sad that no-one actually looks at the abundance of evidence being presented, and then whe the evidence does come to light they say it's probably from an escaped cat!!! Bizarre.

Anyway, the sightings of the Sheppey black leopard persist despite the naysayers, and every report made over the Easter holiday was of a black cat in broad daylight. The Ashford report concerned a couple driving back from Rye when the animal bounded across a field. The female witness reported seeing the blotchy markings under the dark coat - these markings being the rosette pattern. The Harrietsham sighting concerned a young girl who saw a huge black cat pacing near a dead tree. She ran all the way home to tell her parents. At Aylesford several young children reported seeing a massive black cat in their garden. So, can we assume that all these witnesses are hallucinating ? Sure, eye witness reports can be taken with a pinch of salt but there are thousands of reports of 'big cats', some by police officers, some by government scientists and conservationists, others made by doctors, and some even by sceptical folk.

I've always been happy to answer any questions sceptics may have regarding so-called 'big cats' in the wilds of the UK. The case for the existence of 'big cats' in the UK can no longer be doubted, I just wish that the doubters would actually crawl out from under the nose they can't see any further than, and look at the evidence.

I recall a few years ago that on the outskirts of London there had been numerous reports of domestic cats being killed, and in most cases eaten. Bromley, Bexley, Orpington, Petts Wood, etc, had various so-called 'cat rippings'. Instead of looking at the evidence the local press, and even the police, decided a cat serial killer was on the loose! A criminal psychologist was called in in an attempt to find the killer! Clearly, judging by some of the carcasses that were found, a large predatory cat was responsible - the puncture marks in the throat, the rasped flesh - but, after hitting too many dead ends, the local authorities blamed a fox!!!! So, what started happening ? People started killing foxes. The 'phantom cat ripper' moved on, but domestic cats were still being killed around the area.

There have been numerous reports in and around London of so-called 'big cats'. People scoff at the idea that a large cat could roam the capital - now, I'd never expect a lepard, puma et al, to be walking through Oxford Street, far from it, but the outskirts of the capital have several green, heavily wooded areas. Sydenham, Abbey Wood, Belvedere, and of course Surrey, are areas a large cat would prowl at night getting from A to B. In the '60s London was also the place where people kept such cats as pets. And in abundance. There are so many stories of people owning exotic cats, and I've put several of these in my latest book Mystery Animals of the British Isles: London. I was amazed at just how many people owned exotic cats, mainly puma and smaller cats, and kept them in their homes. I'm sure most of you will recall the fantastic story of Christian the lion cub who was purchased from Harrods Dept Store. But many of you will not recall the abundance of other cases where people owned exotic animals, so the book is worth a read if you're interested in 'big cat' stories and London's more beastly aspects of folklore.

Mystery Animals of the British Isles: London is available from Amazon.co.uk  etc

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Animals | Big cats | Big cats, folklore,

Another Maidstone leopard sighting...

by Big cat sightings in Kent, by Neil Arnold Wednesday, March 28 2012

On the 24th March I received the following eye-witness report, concerning a possible black leopard sighting at Ulcombe, in rural Maidstone. The email read:

"I sighted a black cat this morning at about 11:15 this morning.  I was walking down Windmill hill towards Pie Corner with my dog and I saw a black object which at first glance llooked ike a black rubbish bag on the side of the road. I was about 200 yards away as I got closer it turned out to be a large black cat and it was going to the toilet; at this point it was about 100 yards away from me. It looked up at me and the dog , then it finished what it was doing, got up and ambled across the road showing no fear and went through a hedge and disappeared. I went to where I thought it went through the hedge to see if I could see it in the field but it was not to be seen. I went back to where it had gone to the toilet to look for scat but could not find anything so I guess it was having a wee. It was strange there were two pheasants wandering near by one only a few feet away from it, they seemed not nervous of it and it did not have any interest in them so I guess it had eaten.  The cats tail was long, I would think as long as its body  and had the head of a leopard and I am guessing I would think it was a very young adult ( not quite a kitten and not quite an adult) adolescent is the word I was trying to think of. I hope this is of help."

Over the last few years Ulcombe had produced several sightings of an overly large cat. There are many woods and fields around the area, and certainly lots of food. A few years ago I was contacted by an Ulcombe resident who claimed that she'd got a photo of a large black cat in her back garden. The witness is very genuine, and the photo, which appeared in the local KM paper, certainly appeared to show some type of black cat. The image was snapped on a trigger camera, and it caused quite a alot of debate and sadly, when the witness posted the photo to various sites asking about the animal in the photo, she was criticised, which was extremely unfair. I visited the garden of the lady in question and took a thorough look around the area. The photo certainly showed a large black cat-like animal sitting on its haunches, just a few feet away from the woman's back door. I showed the photo to naturalists, zoologists and a number of wildlife researchers, and a majority agreed that it was a very large animal. The detractors spat their dummies out and began making personal insults, stating that I'd said the image was a leopard, when in fact I hadn't. However, whilst some people believd it was nothing more than a domestic cat and it's their right to have an opinion) certain details didn't add up. For a start, the cat in the photo was, when sitting on its haunches ,almost as high as the tulip fencing, which is three-feet high. Sceptics claimed the animal was a domestic cat that was sitting on something, but interestingly, there was nothing for the animal to sit on except a flower bed.

The trigger camera had been placed at the bottom of the garden facing the house and the animal was seen peering to the right. In the photograph the animal has large, bright eyes, long greyish/white whiskers but due to the poor picture quality of the camera, no species could be confirmed. One zoologist told me that the animal was a sub-adult leopard, another stated it was a large feral cat. Others suggested the animal was a hybrid, "But of what ?," I asked with a degreee of scepticism.

Whatever the animal is in the photo, it has left paw prints in the garden, and may well be visiting the area frequently - probably because within fifty yards there are woods and rolling fields. The photograph is a mystery, like so many other alleged 'big cat' photographs. What saddened me was the fact that a genuine witness had come forward to report her find and was criticised by a number of so-called researchers who clearly didn't look at the photo with any depth or investigate the area, or measure the fence etc.

The recent sighting of a young black leopard in Ulcombe adds weight to what I've believed all along - that there are at least two black leopards roaming the fields not far from Ulcombe. Whether one is in the trigger came' photo we'll never know, but when witnesses come forward to report their sightings or present their evidence they certainly shouldn't be ridiculed. After all, there are far less conclusive photographs in published works which claim to be 'big cats', when they are nothing more than domestic cats.

There is a posisbility the Ulcombe cat was the same animal seen recently near Paddock Wood by a woman on a train. Witnesses often report sleek black cats with smallish head, and I've read some hilarious theories that these animals are melanistic (of dark pigment) pumas, but a melanistic puma would still have a slate grey/white underside. Also, a female leopard would have a smaller head than the male, so it's no real mystery when people report sleek-looking black cats. Interestingly, there has been recent press coverage elsewhere in the country of a melanistic fox - the white brush of the tail still evident. I'm sure a few people will come forward now and claim that the black foxes can be used to explain big cat sightings, but the walk and look of a fox, even in the distance is nothing like a black leopard. For a start, the tail is very different - even a mangy fox does not resemble a leopard, and the muzzle of a fox and awkward gait is also a dead give away.

It seems a very popular hobbie nowadays to go out into the countryside and set up trigger camera's,and many people believe this is the only chance we have of getting a 'big cat' on film. Sometimes I agree with this, other times I don't. There's nothing like seeing a 'big cat' in the wilds with your own eyes. However, in this age of advanced technology there is an obsession with getting these animals on film - mainly for personal gain, or an ego boost and five minutes of fame. All I will say is that if you do get one on film, make sure the image is crystal clear, otherwise you may end up looking a fool or being made out to be a fool. I'm sure the tabloids or large presas agencies will give you a couple of quid for it and it'll make the front page for ten minutes, but it will only prove one thing - our desire to run off and reveal our find to the press. 'Big cats' in the wilds of the UK could be monitored for many years, but this requires patience, and a love of nature in general. After the hassle the witness got after getting the snap of the mystery cat in Ulcombe, I can see why others may not be so forthcoming with their evidence.

 

Tags: , , , ,
Categories: Animals | Big cats | Big cats, folklore,

Is there a 'big cat' roaming Sheppey ?

by Big cat sightings in Kent, by Neil Arnold Monday, March 5 2012

For many years there has been rumour that a large, black cat has been inhabiting the 30 square mile island of Sheppey. The thought that a cat - presumably a black leopard - inhabits the marshes of the island seems preposterous to many, and yet sightings continue. The Sheerness Times Guardian newspaper called me today to say they'd received a phone call from a Sheerness lady who claimed that last Thursday she had observed such an animal bounding down from the roof of a small industrial building. The sighting took place in broad daylight and her husband also saw the cat. I'd be happy to cast such a sighting to one side if it wasn't for the fact that since the mid '90s there have been consistent reports of a large cat on the island. Some would argue that sightings date back several decades previous to this but reports I've filed to sgguest this are scant. In my book Mystery Animals Of The British Isles: Kent I devoted a whole chapter to the 'black cat' of Sheppey and in 2008 visited the island with the BBC who set up a trigger camera for one week at Minster in the hope of catching the elusive animal on film. As expected, they didn't get the animal on film, but it was nice to speak to so many people who had seen the cat - and many witnesses had seen the cat in broad daylight.

Reports from the island are sporadic, mainly due to the fact that much of the island is marsh and the populated areas exist as small pockets - in other words, the only people who take to the marsh are farmers, hunters and dog-walkers. There are two ways on and off the island, two bridges, one which harbours a railway line, and some have theoriesd that this cat moves on and off the island via the railway line but this remains unfounded. A large, elusive, predatory cat would not have to leave the island if there was enough cover and prey - and believe me, there is. Although the territory of a leopard can stretch to several hundred square miles, the island, with its marsh, ditches, dykes, fields and hedgerows is ideal habitat for an animal that would normally hunt at night. And as for prey, the island is prefect. Rabbit, birds, rats, mice, foxes - the island is alive with wildlife, and farms full of livestock are dotted about the seemingly desolate wastes. Although the winter there is harsh, it would enable a large animal to move from A to B without being detected. The areas around some of the prisons are remote and the cliff edges are dense and steep. Some visitors to the island wouldn't even find the local radio station let alone a solitary and secretive cat!!

Some people believe that the reason a cat roams the island is because one such animal was released there in the '70s or '80s. It is very much a fact that in the '80s a chap did keep a large cat on the island - but it was a puma called Kitten. I don't know what happened to it, but a majority of reports describe a big black cat, which is not the colour of a puma (and anyway, a cat released in the '80s would be long gone by now). I'm also aware in the past that someone kept a lion or two on the island. The marsh area could certainly support a lynx or a puma, but occasionally a black leopard will be sighted as it crosses a field, or slinks along a roadside. There is also the opinion that the animal sticks to the coastal path, which in turn, if it wanted to, could take it off the island - it's no surprise that there have bene numerous reports from Sittingbourne, Iwade etc, just across the river - but I'm of the opinion that the cat is very much content on the island. The only issue of course is that a lot of shooting goes on in the marsh area...a few years back the Times Guardian did cover a story where a man claimed to have seen a big black cat shot by a farmer (who probably burned or buried the carcass) but there are some big feral cats on the island too, so who knows...

The so-called 'beast of Sheppey' has been observed in the summer months making its way along the back of some of the caravan parks on the island. It's been seen crossing near Warden Bay and observed near one of the prisons. The island is relatively flat with no real woodland - unusual habitat for a leopard which would normal patrol forest area. But again, at night the sland takes on a different form, much of the thirty-square mile territory is pitch black and stretches as far as the eye can see during the day.

The animal on the island may have been released there in the '90s at some point (in the mid to late '90s people reported seeing a young black leopard at Eastchurch), which would mean the animal is on its last legs now, unless of course there is more than one. The island certainly doesn't seem big enough to support a family of 'big cats' unless they were coming off the island. If one considers the woodland on the other side of the river, an animal that roams Sheppey could, the next day, be in Maidstone. One report however, which always sticks in my mind took place the day I filmed on the island with the BBC. Several witnesses were interviwed regarding their sightings of the black cat but when I got home after filming a taxi driver phoned me to say he'd seen a puma crossing a field. When he said "puma" I had to correct him and say, "Don't you mean a panther ?" (as most people get their species of cats confused) but no, he was adamant that what he'd seen was in fact a large, tan-coloured cat that crept across a field inhabited by horses. Every now and then a report of a puma takes place on the island and I don't doubt them, because however unrealistic sceptics think this would be, the isle of Sheppey remains one of the most ideal places for a cat or two to hide.

 

I'm more interested as to where it came from because as in so many of these sightings, the past seems to reveal alot more than the present day. By putting together the stories of the past however, we can hopefully answer the questions we seek today. Too many researchers look at the sightings nowadays and concentrate solely on them, but this will not give you any answers at all. If we can work out roughly how far back these sightings go, then maybe, once and for all we can determine if we've had cat populations for centuries, rather than decades. I know that animals existed in the woods back in the early 1900s and certainly a hundred years previous, but were they small populations which died out - only to be replaced by the explosion of releases in the 1960s, or are the animals of today offspring of those generations that we today, seem to ignore.

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , ,
Categories: Animals | Big cats | Big cats, folklore,

Photographic evidence and bodies...

by Big cat sightings in Kent, by Neil Arnold Friday, February 24 2012

 

I'm of the opinion that no amount of evidence in support of large, exotic cats roaming Britain, is good enough for the most hardened sceptics, which is a shame really. Today I spoke with a man who stated that quite categorically a few years back he caught a strange animal - cat-like - in a snare in Kentish woodlands, and had taken a photo of it. The animal had, sadly, died in the snare, but when I asked the man - who was very experienced in the wilds of Kent regarding poaching etc - what he did with the carcass he replied, "We left it and it just rotted." Over the years I've spoken to dozens of people who have claimed to have shot a big cat, or run one over or found a dead one, and in every case these people have either burned or buried the carcass. In most cases this was long before the country was buzzing with researchers keen on making some money out of a good photo or other piece of evidence. And in any case, most people who do come across a carcass - especially if they have shot the animal, aren't going to tell many people about it. As you can see on this blog there have been a few cases over the years across the countryside of the UK where exotic animals have bene run over or shot. Mind you, I'm often asked why we don't find many dead ones, but there is an easy explanation for this and it doesn't involve silly conspiracy theories etc. Basically, if you consider that a large, yet extremely elusive animal is prowling around the remote thickets of Kent, then that means it is avoiding main roads, in fact most sightings I get of animals crossing a road usually involves a motorist travelling on a remote b-road in the wilds of Ashford etc. There isn't much chance that a large cat is going to run out in front of car in such a remote location. However, if a cat did then it still knows to kepe a distance but, if by chance the cat is hit, it may crawl away to die or, as in the case of alot of road kill, vanish simply due to the progression of nature. If you consider also how many sightings of large cats take place after dusk, then you can see why these cats are hardly ever filmed or photographed. However, what seems to be the case is that a piece of footage, no matter how clear, or whether it's been scrutinised and passed by 'experts', it's still not going to convince a hardened sceptic. In reality, I'd love to ask the sceptics one question back (because the sceptics seem quite happy to bombard me), and that is, What would it take to prove to you that these animals exist ? Some would respond that seeing is believing, but is it really when you are so closed off to such a situation ? Some people don't even believe their own eyes. Would a clear, up close photo prove anything ? Of course not, sceptics could argue that it came from a zoo. Over the last few years a terrible hoax photo has been doing the rounds showing what is meant to be a black leopard in a field in Staffordshire. Of course, the image is simply a cut 'n' paste job onto a backround, but I guess these 'big cat' stories bring out the best and worst of people. I still don't think a 'big cat' with young would convince many people, so maybe a cat killing a sheep would, but there's so little chance of getting this on film, and there's a major reason one - no-one is out there putting the time and effort in. Trigger camera's are fine but they mean that someone has to keep checking them. ideally, the people who are going out to film leopards in Africa, etc, are the people we need in the UK, but they haven't the time to do this, and some of these guys may feel that their reputation will be tarnished, which is a pity, as I'm sure that any wildlife cameraman that films a 'big cat' in the UK may see his profile soar. The trouble is, all we have at the moment are 'experts' telling us these animals don't exist rather than looking at the evidence we have and taking it further. Sure, we've had hair analysed, DNA from saliva will eventually prove also that there are 'big cats' around, but it's still not enough. Only today I picked up a cutting from the Daily Mail of November 30th 1994 concerning the escape of a female snow leopard from a private collection in Hertfordshire. It made me realise how easy it is for a cat to escape but also how relatively easy it is for one to get recaptured, which is why I don't believe the animals we have in the wilds today are zoo escapees. Hopefully, with the evidence for such animals accumulating since the 1960s Surrey puma cat-flap (excuse the pun!), all we can do is continue to collate, but I don't think 'big cat' research should be in effect to appease the sceptics. At times we seem to forget that it's about the animals and not the personal egos that are involved. There are always detractors, there are sceptics, and I guess that's what makes the debate healthy to some extent but the problem is, it has become every man for himself, as in most walks of life so no wonder people are hesitant to come forward with their evidence...but you know what a sceptic would say to that, "Maybe they don't want to come forward because they don't have any evidence," so you can't win either way. Deep down I hope these cats outlive us all and I also hope that a child is never attacked by one in the wilds. I'm also of the opinion that if someone gets their 'irrefutible' evidence (whatever that may be), that it will of course only prove one thing - that there's one large cat out there. The situation as a whole is far greater than many realise and even if the authorities (whoever they may be) admit to such animals existing in our wilds (which is highly unlikely) I still don't see us moving on or out from the shadow of the sceptical view.

 

Tags: , , , , , ,
Categories: Big cats | Big cats, folklore, | Blue Bell Hill

Where to report a big cat sighting ?

by Big cat sightings in Kent, by Neil Arnold Tuesday, February 21 2012

Apologies for the lack of updates in the last week or so. Writing committments and ventures into Kent woodlands have prevented recent entries. One trip, with a friend, took us to Burham Downs, and right across the Downs towards Blue Bell Hill. I recall a year or so ago a local gamekeeper moaning about my research. He came out with the classic line, "There is no big cat on Blue Bell Hill...I've spent many years around the hill and never seen a thing...". It's this type of naive attitude that frustrates me. On Sunday 19th February me and my good friend walked miles through the woods around Burham, Wouldham etc. We saw one solitary fox, which was eyeing us up from its bramble thick domain, and two rabbits which scurried off into a quarry. The area seemed bereft of life and yet there were areas strewn with fox faeces and rabbit droppings, but of course there was no sign of a large cat - finding a piece of scat would be like looking for a needle in a haystack for some people, and it's amazing how many pieces actually get trodden on by people on bridle paths. Even so, an area of woodland that stretches from Burham, to Blue Bell Hill, to Boxley, is vast for a human to walk - down in the lower quarries we didn't even bump into a human, rather strange considering Sunday was a lovely day for a countryside ramble. I did think of that sceptical gamekeeper though as we pushed our way through bracken and bramble and then sat quietly in those dense areas. It made me realise how useless the human is when it comes to acting like an animal - our sense of hearing, sight and smell, especially in the darkness, is no match for a large cat. One can see why most sightings are so brief, mainly concerning people who are driving or walking the dog.

Not sure if anyone saw it but about 2 weeks ago Meridian News covered a bizarre story from Seaford in Sussex where a couple claimed that a leopard had walked into their front room. I find it so hard to take such reports seriously - it reminded me of a chap a few years ago from Nunhead, London who claimed that one night he felt rather ill and so opened the door for a bit of fresh air only to see a massive black cat stroll into his front room. Now, if this sort of thing happened, surely this would be main news, or at least followed up ? Were there hair samples on the carpet ? And, in the case of the couple, why on earth was their front door open at night - or did Mr Leopard have a key ? These are the sort of reports that make a mockery of any type of serious research but sadly, these are the type of reports that make the newspapers etc. I guess the sceptics etc are fed up of the usual, "I was driving and it crossed the road..." stories, but the fact is, these are the most consistent.

A contact of mine in the Tonbridge/Tunbridge Wells area recently sent me another photo of a deer kill - and also the image of some scat. Once again it appears that someone has trodden on the scat - which, by the way, is full of deer fur. I recently conducted several talks, one in Farningham Road where I was approached by a young lady who told me that she'd seen a huge, muscular black cat whilst driving through Sevenoaks. Sadly, her partner did not believe a word of it and I wonder just how many people don't report their sightings due to a fear of ridicule. Some witnesses even question their own sanity. Eye-witness reports can be vague but as I've stated previously, some witnesses get clear views of these animals and know what they are seeing. I was also recently contacted by a guy who works for a safari company via Surrey and he was amazed when he recently saw a black leopard in the county. Conducting talks to specific groups and also the general public is a huge buzz for me because it enables me to make the audience aware of what signs to look for and to explain the theories as to why such animals exist in our woods. By giving talks it also enables witnesses to come forward to report their encounters, and they come forward in their droves...

A majority of people do not know where to report their sightings of any unusual animals. If sightings are reported to the police most of these remain in the files, but those I've examined can be very vague, i.e. Feb 1st, Maidstone, black cat sighted. Other sightings are made towards local papers, but only occasionally are the sightings featured in a decent article - otherwise we get the usual stuff from the major tabloids. Although I have received thousands of reports over the years there must be a decent amount of people who've never told a soul about what they've seen. I was also contacted by someone regarding a photo if an alleged exotic cat. Over the years many people have claimed to have shot/run over a cat - or knew someone who has, and, of course, evidence is usually scant. In my book MYSTERY ANIMALS OF THE BRITISH ISLES: KENT I featured a photo which someone claimed was of a puma that had been caught in a trap in North Kent. The image in the book clearly shows a domestic cat which has been photographed then stuck on as if it is hanging from a tree - in no way is the image of a large, exotic animal. However, one chap did say that a few years ago he had snared a smaller exotic cat so we'll see what happens...it reminded me of the case a few years back when a buolder claimed that he'd seen someone shoot a 'big cat' on a pheasant shoot on the Isle of Sheppey. Again, this seems unlikely and I'm more inclined to think the team of beaters had encountered a large feral cat. Sceptics argue that there are never any bodies of 'big cats' but again, this is such a naive attitude. You can walk for miles, for years, through vast forest and never find a deer that has died of natural causes and there are thousands of deer, mind you, exotic cat bodies have been found - animals have been shot dead and run over, but these are generally smaller cats, but absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence.

Many 'big cat' stories seem to fade into urban legend, this is understandable when the stories are old and they get passed down through generations like Chinese whispers. Over the years I've bene told numerous fantastic tales which are rarely verified. There was the case down in Maidstone where a family claimed that a black leopard had been killed by a car. The animal was in a ditch and the famil watched in amazement as two leopards came out of the woods and were sniffing round the carcass. Then there's the story from Tonbridge way of the woman who heard a thud on her conservatory roof and found a dead lynx which she believed had been killed by a larger cat. Apparently the woman threw the lynx over the back fence and the newspaper came out and photographed it. This has never been provem. Then there was the chap in Dover who claimed that his car was written off when he struck a lynx and then there was the day I spent trying to run across a motorway in order to find the alleged carcass of an enormous spotted cat. Bizarrely, all we found was a tiny cuddly leopard toy was the witness was adamant that the previous day crows had bene pecking at a large, decomposing animal. Cover up or a simple case of misidentification ? However fascinating these type of stories are, many are nothing more than legend, or, byt he time you arrive on the scene things turn out to be not quite as dramatic as one would hope.

I do wonder how many reports the authorities receive of cats that have been run over etc. A rather cowardly chap recently at a poke at me (he didn't use his actual name of course...very brave) regarding an article that appeared in a major paper regarding the alleged cover up of big cat bodies by the Ministry of Defence. It had been claimed that the MoD were hiding such bodies from the public, and that they'd been picking alleged carcasses up from the roadside and possibly analysing them in some type of covert fashion. It makes for a great story but my opinion is that if a body of a leopard was run over and it was reported to the 'authorities', then surely they would - i.e. the MoD - have the right to take that body away. Why would they need to consult the local 'big cat' researcher or give the carcass to the local news station ? Maybe the MoD have taken bodies into the bowels of their secret laboratories, but isn't this getting into the realms of aliens and UFOs ? If a leopard is found, and obviously it would be considered a danger to the public - especially if it's injured - then the authorities would have a right to deal with it. Whether we believe in cover up's or not, is not the question, but the main problem is that too many researchers are creating, in their minds a complex web of intrigue about the British 'big cat' situation. Yes, it is possible bodies have been investigated by the MoD, but I'm pretty sure that if a local researcher found a carcass of a 'big cat' he'd be all too keen to splash it over the news thinking that once and for all he'd found his Holy Grail...but one body does not solve a mystery. All it does is give a local researcher a massage of his ego.

I'm pretty sure there are people out there gagging to capture a big cat or find a dead one. At the moment there are trigger cameras everywhere hoping to catch a glimpse of  cat, and then of course it'll be all over the tabloids for a week then fade...until the next one. I distinctly recall a few years ago some fantastic photo's in a major tabloid showing a puma looking through a patio door of a house in a Welsh valley...great photo, but the general opinion is "so what ?", and this is how it'll always be unless someone of authority turns round and says "Yes, we DO have leopard and puma in our wilds", but that's not going to happen unless all these cats form a gang and start killing people. When a mystery comes along people make their own minds up - they create conspiracy theories, they start thinking that because they haven't seen a 'big cat' that such animals are paranormal or teasing them, others seem to believe there are thousands of big cats around, others suggest that they aren't big cats but monster hybrids, so it all adds to the melting pot. The one thing lacking of course is consistency but as we know...consistency doesn't make a newspaper headline. Everyone has their own opinion...fair enough...and those that see such animals will react in their own personal way...and I'm sure a day will come when one or more cats is filmed very clearly, and who knows, with the amount of people scouring the woods and fields maybe a dead leopard or puma will turn up...but people will still say "so what?" and maybe they have a right to. After all, it's just a large cat in a place it shouldn't be...

...but if you see one, or have any evidence, then please forward it to me at:  neil.arnold@live.com   I'll happily come and have a look, and advise.

 

Tags: , , ,
Categories: Animals | Big cats | Big cats, folklore, | Blue Bell Hill

Where do all these 'big cats' come from ?

by Big cat sightings in Kent, by Neil Arnold Tuesday, February 7 2012

I see that on The Sun website there is more debatable footage of an alleged 'big cat'. It's rather frustrating when people come forward and state that such 'evidence' is "the most conclusive" despite the fact that so many pieces of film footage are shot from a distance and are often blurry. Any sceptic would have the right to argue at such a piece of film, and so many of these types of footage seem to be floating around on You Tube and the like....but these would be the last place I'd submit footage. What is clear is that in the UK...and the same as Australia, there are a lot of large feral cats, a few years ago in Australia a man shot a feral cat that was four-feet in length! Even so, a feral/domestic cat does not look like a puma or leopard, but in my opinion any footage that is blurry or debatable shouldn't be put forward as evidence. It's great that people are roaming the countryside with camera's but to get close enough to a predatory cat requires patience and a lot of luck, but it is also dangerous and that's the concern that many people seem to be forgetting amid the mystery.

Many people ask the question, Where the hell do all these cats come from ? There is quite a simple set of answers on this question and there's no real mystery. Sadly, the mystery of the topic is all that people want. Over the years people looking into the subject have come to the conclusion that there are more than 1000 'big cats' roaming the UK - this is a laughable statistic and wildly off the mark. It's certainly fair to say that it's impossible to judge how many puma, leopard, lynx etc there are, but to say there are a 1000 is ridiculous. Only a year or so ago it was claimed that 13...yes, 13, black leopards were roaming the Romney Marsh area of Kent...where do people get this sort of information! Having researched this subject since the early '80s I've seen only a steady rise in numbers, which would be correct if say a female black leopard had produced between 1and 8 cubs in her short lifespan. There isn't one female on heat scouring the countryside, and whilst every county DOES have a 'big cat' legend, we can only guess that there are small but viable populations. If the country was running alive with 'big cats', as some newspaper headlines claimed recently, then we'd have a majr problem. Whether people like the theory or not, it is a fact that a majority of the animals seen today are offspring of animals from animals released in the '60s,'70s and early '80s around the time of the '76 Dangerous Wild Animals Act. My research has proven that in a majority of English counties in the '60s, people owned puma, lynx and black leopard - lions were also purchased - the most popular story concerning the lion cub, Christian, purchased from Harrords in London. A majority of folk who purchased exotic cats - usually as cute and cuddly cubs/kittens, didn't go to the newspapers with their pets, they kept them in their front room, in shoddy basements, and only a few cases were actually highlighted by the media. In my 2009 book Mystery Animals of the British Isles: Kent I listed thousands of eye witness reports of exotic cats across the south-east and examined some of the theories. My recently published follow up, Mystery Animals of the British Isles: London also looked at several cases of animals being kept as pets. For example, there's the case of the chap who walked into his pub in London in 1974 with his pet puma on a lead. The cat became very agitated ripping apart the upholstery of the pub. The man was eventually fined. In another incident a man purchased a puma kitten for his children and it attacked a child. A lion 'playfully' leapt on a woman as she was walking down a London street, and another man owned a serval - an African hunting cat - which bit a friend in a restaurant. These cases are not rare. In the '60s and '70s it was quite common to own an exotic cat - as well as a menagerie of exotic animals, from monkeys, to reptiles. One man ordered a rhino from Harrods! These animals were simply an extension of someone's ego, a status symbol, a novel pet - just like terrapins, snakes and baby alligators have bene over the years. When the 1976 Dangerous Animals Act was introduced it is a known fact that people DID release their pets. A puma kitten or leopard cub could easily survive in the wilds of England. I've no doubt that the Surrey puma legend began due to a cat that had been released from a private collection - although this does not explain the mystery creature seen around Coulsdon in the 1800s! Even so, whilst lions and larger cats were purchased, it was the smaller cats, especially lynx and puma and jungle cat, whic were released, and the black leopard was certainly the iconic animal to own in the '60s. You'll find that in almost every case, if not all, regarding tigers, lions etc, escaping, they've either been recaptured or shot dead. One fascinating case from the '70s, regarding Kent involved a Mr Fred Lloyd, who, whilst fishing on the banks of the River Medway at East Peckham, on 5th Jan' 1974, got the shock of his life when a black leopard cub rolled out of the bushes. "I grabbed it by the scruff of the neck", Fred told the newsppaers that covered the incident, "...and shoved it straight into my fishing box."

The animal hissed and growled and so Mr Lloyd took it home and put it in a play-pen but the animal proceeded to destroy it and so he transfered it to a beer crate. Mr Lloyd phoned several zoo parks but they, bizarrely, laughed at him. 24 hours later an RSPCA Inspector arrived on the scene but no-one came forward to say they'd lost a 'panther'. Weirdly, a 'panther' cub, caled Zar had allegedly been stolen from a zoo in Essex on 4th January, but there's no evidence to suggest this was the same cat - thought to be worth in the region of £600. It seems highly unlikely this was the same animal, and this may well have been the first case on record where someone actually captured a leopard cub that had been born in the wilds of England. On 22nd Jan' 1975 The Daily Mirror ran a story concerning a London man who had split up from his wife and so decided to leave his aggravated pet puma in the back garden of his former home. Westminster MP, Peter Templemore, when commenting to the press stated, "Sooner or later someone will get killed", and yet three decades later we find that we've not moved on in our progress at offisially recognising the situation we have in the UK regarding so-called 'big cats'.  A puma escaped from a garden in Byton, Hertfordshire on 1st Jan' 1975 - it was never confirmed as to whether to animal was recaptured. These sort of cases are numerous, and again, prove that people were keeping such animals across the country and certainly when the 1976 Act was introduced, a majority of people did not give their animals to zoo parks and certainly did not destroy their 'pets', and so they released them. Even so, there is no evidence of bizarre cross-bred cats out there, so there'd certainly have to be enough of each species for there to be a viable population today, and this is the case. In the 1940s an Orpington man, as a child, was given a present by his father who'd been abroad on war duty. The man was given a cute black cat which decided to eat the next door neighbours cat. The family did not have a clue what sort of cat they had and so asked a vet who stated quite categorically that it was a 'panther' cub. With that, the father went straight to the most remote woodland he knew and released the animal. Only a decade or so ago a man from Torquay, in Devon, phoned police to say say he'd released his "black puma" but wouldn't say where as he didn't want such a "beautiful" animal hunted. Again, these are quite common occurrences. However, these cases do not explain the reports which date back more than a century.

During the Victorian era many people had private menagerie's and travelling zoo's. Barnum, Wombwell, Bostock, Jamrach, just a few well known showmen who would exhibit all manner of curious creatures and oddments to draw in the gullible crowds. However, in my book Mystery Animals of....London I highlighted many, many cases of animals escaping into the wilds, one involving a leopard that escaped in Camden, and even a tiger that grabbed a small child. These are not stories concocted by sensational headlines, despit the fact that newspapers have always sought out a beastly tale or two. If one takes the time to trawl countless archives - and it is an exhaustive process - you'd be amazed at how many stories there are concerning not just exotic cats escaping/being released into the wilds, but a whole host of animals - from wallabies, monkeys, snakes, birds of prey, and not al of these were recaptured or shot dead. There has been a legend around Blue Bell Hill of a large, elusive animal for at leats 400 hundred years! That's a long, long time. Old records know the legend as the 'great dogge' but this beast was said to roam parts of Trottiscliffe too two hundred years later, but one one occasion this 'lean, grey' animal with 'prick't ears' was said to have killed a man who was walking on the Pilgrims Way. There were also rumours of a black leopard being shot near Burham in the 1930s. I was told this information by a Mr Cuckow many years ago because as a child, he, and a few other friends actually saw this happen. They believed it may have escaped the local zoo at Maidstone which was run by Sir Garrard Tyrwhitt Drake but this was never confirmed. Interestingly, I recently read of this case in a new book called Big Cats just a shame the author couldn't have mentioned that he got the information from me! It's also worth noting that even the Roman's housed large cats - but not the puma - in their vast amphitheatre's, and there is also legend that during the wars some pilots brought over exotic cats as mascots, and were then told to shot them but may have released them instead, but this has never been proven and certainly wouldn't account for the amount of sightings there have been. Again, we have to look at consistency and in my two books I've highlighted so many cases that even the most sceptical person would find difficult to debunk.

So, there you have it...a brief explanation as to where black leopard, puma, lynx etc have come from. Interesting to note as well that I've never, in all my years of conducting this research, received a sighting of a leopard with normal pelage. Black leopard parents only produce black offspring, due to a recessive gene, and over the course of a few decades the rosette pattern will gradually seem to phase out due to the density of the darkness. The strain is less dominant in squirrels, but in the leopard in the UK it appears very dominant. I'm happy to consider that we may have leopards of the normal pelage but again, there needs to be consistency in reports for me to take this into consideration. The same also goes for animals with varying coat markings which do not seem to fit in with conventional markings.

Mystery Animals of the British Isles: Kent and Mystery Animals of the British Isles: London are available from Amazon and can also be ordered from bookshops such as Waterstone's.

 

 

Tags: , , , , , ,
Categories: Animals | Big cats | Blue Bell Hill | Medway

More evidence...

by Big cat sightings in Kent, by Neil Arnold Friday, February 3 2012

Recent visits to the wilds of Dartford Heath and the marshes of Higham and Cliffe prove without a shadow of a doubt that there is enough cover in the county of Kent to hide a handful of elusive animals. When one considers the amount of forest still left, especially in places such as Ashford, Canterbury, and neighbouring Sussex, I'm rather surprised how many people seem to think that there's nowhere in county for a large cat to conceal itself. Paw prints and scat (faeces) are relatively easy to find on remote pathways. Paw prints can of course be distorted in snow and ruined on bridle paths by dogs, horses, people, bikes, but they can be found. In most cases the paw print of a leopard or puma will be bereft of claw marks - cats retract their claws but dogs do not - dog prints are symmetrical in shape and the claws will be blunt. When a cat does throw its claws out, usually to grip, they'll often show as tiny pin pricks around the toes. The main pad is often 'away' from the toes whereas you'll find a dog pad seems to be pushed up behind the toes. The images show a sketch of a print and also an actual 'big cat' print found near Tonbridge, and cast.

Left - sketch of cougar print. Note three lobes on base of pad. Also, prints can be distorted as the rear paw of the cat comes forward to step in the front impression.

 

 

 Left, leopard prints cast in Penshurst.

With regards to other prints it's always worth getting used to the marks made by native species - badger, fox, deer. It's amazing how many photographs I get sent when we've had a heavy snow fall. As snow thaws prints distort as they melt and one animal that often leaves a fist-sized impression in the snow is a rabbit! Although the print would be bereft of a main pad, when a rabbit sits on its haunches it leaves seemingly four toe marks, this is caused by the front two feet and the hind feet. If you are unfamilar with animal tracks and signs it's worth looking on the internet or buying a book to guide you and then you'll know what to eliminate when looking for a cat. Other evidence left by large cats would be scratch marks on trees. Badgers marks trees up to a couple of feet, and deer often mark bark with their antlers, but a cat such as a leopard will often reach several feet up a bark not only to sharpen its claws but a male leopard sweats from his feet, excreting a scent from a gland as a marker. Bark will often be peeled back or there will be deep score marks. In some cases it will be worth looking around the base of the tree in case the cat had shed a claw.

Hair samples are also worth taking - a couple of years ago hair found in woods in Devon were analysed and proven to belong to a melanistic leopard. Hair can often be found on game trails in England where deer, foxes etc, travel through wiry bushes or under barbed wire fences etc. Hair can also be found on the carcass of prey.

 

Finally, we have scat. Leopard, puma, lynx, like any animal drop scat. Their scat reflects what they've eaten - when dry ,the scat of a leopard, which can reach lengths of 8 or so inches, will appear in chain formation and be greysih in complexion and it'll be full of hair and bone. Usually deer and rabbit fur is evident. The image below was photographed by a James Mitson who has proven to be a vital contact in the heavily wooded areas of Tunbridge Wells. James has photographed deer, fox and rabbit kills and numerous scat. It's always worth looking on countryside pathways, especially near to where dogs have desposited. cats mark their territory. On one occasion a huge piece of scat found has actually be trodden on by a dog walker!

 

Left, leopard scat - photo by James Mitson - sample is full of deer fur. Three separate zoologists agreed this scat was from a large cat species.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Big cat sightings: Where's the evidence ?

by Big cat sightings in Kent, by Neil Arnold Thursday, February 2 2012

Left - Hary Matthews photo taken in 1998 of an unusual cat on Cooling marshes.I have just come back from giving a lecture today in Gravesend on the 'mystery animals of Kent', and the feedback, as always ranges from stunned, to spooked, with many of the sceptics in the audience impressed by the evidence I presented. I also noticed that in today's edition of The Guardian newspaper, that a deer carcass, which many people believed had been killed by a 'big cat', in Gloucestershire, had been confirmed as being killed by a dog then scavenged by a fox. This wasn't a surprise to me, despite many people being adamant it had been a cat kill, but the DNA analysis proved otherwise. It's great that 'authorities' are, at times, when they have the time and in some instances the money, analysing alleged evidence of 'big cat' activity because people often say to me that there is no evidence whatsoever that large cats exist in the UK. I find it strange that with so much evidence that the 'big cat' situation is regarded as a mystery and relegated to folklore. Even more bizarre, when evidence is presented to the sceptical eye, they refuse to believe it, even if a majority of disbelievers don't actually know what they are looking at. Some people would scoff at it even if it bit them on the nose and this type of ignorance isn't healthy to any situation.

When walking through the woods it's important to know what you are looking at in regards to native species as well as possible non-native species. It's vital when examining possible 'big cat' evidence, to eliminate every other possibility. In the south-east of England we have foxes, deer, badger, dogs, domestic cats, squirrels, and countless other animals, many which are rarely seen. In parts of Kent and Sussex there are also wild boar and wallaby - bizarrely these animals are also dismissed by sceptics even though they've bene photographed and filmed.

Most people would think that surely the best evidence to support the existence of a 'big cat' cat would be to film it - this is far easier said than done even in today's climate with people walkinga round with mobile phones etc. The problem is, a leopard or puma is an incredibly elusive animal, they can hear, se and smell a human, and often keep their distance. A majority of sightings are so brief and usually involve motorists travelling late at night or during the early hours, or people walking their dog etc. A cat often sticks to hedgreows, tree-lines etc and hunt under the cloak of night - no-one drives with their phone at the ready and if your security light comes on at night the last thing you expect to see in your garden is a black leopard. Even so, many people nowadays are using trigger camera's which they are setting up across the country - this is fine, but it seems that some people just want to film the local 'beast' to make some money out of it and to allegedly 'be the first'. In Kent there have been a few cases where cats have been caught on film, but across the UK film footage does exist - in 2011 a Jungle Cat was filmed crossing a road in the Meopham area near Gravesend. In 1998 Harry Matthews took a photo of an unusual cat on marshes at Cooling. Bizarrely, this photo has appeared on several websites (in other words, stolen) with people claiming it's the 'beast of Bodmin' etc. The cat in the photo is no 'big cat', but it could well be a Jungle Cat or a hybrid of Jungle Cat/domestic cat. Bizarrely, the local news channels at the time when covering the story of the photo claimed it was the 'beast of Blue Bel Hill' even though the animal was seen on the other side of the river, and clearly wasn't something akin to a black leopard. In 1994 a holiday-maker claimed he'd filmed a large black cat at Aylesford Priory, a few miles outside of Maidstone. I'm of the opinion that most footage of so-called 'big cats' will be ridiculed because sceptics expect someone to walk up to a leopard and photograoh it from a few feet away, this is highly unlikely to occur. For me we must look at what I consider to be the best evidence for 'big cats' in the wild, the sheep and deer kills. The photo's here are proof that farmers do lose sheep, and that deer are certainly high on the menu - wherever the deer move so do the cats, and it'ss even more amazing when deer and sheep are found high up in trees. Leopards take their prey into trees, as discussed in the last post. Whilst deer and sheep make an ideal meal for a cat, there is far easier prey to catch - rats, mice, birds, squirrels, foxes - sceptics expect there to be thousands of slaughtered sheep but this isn't the case, but there are cases throughout the south-east where farmers have succumbed to severe livestock losses.

 

 

 

This sheep was killed not far from Blue Bell Hill. When a leopard kills its prey it often goes for the throat leaving puncture marks. A large cat rasps the fleece/fur and leaves a very clean kill. No other animal kills in this fashion - foxes do not bring deer down, and certainly do not stash them in trees! The farmer who lost this sheep had never, in 40 years of farming lost a sheep before. In the same area other farmers had lost a few sheep in similar fashion.

In most cases of large prey, the head is left untouched, birds tend to peck the eyes and foxes will scavenge. It does not take long for a carcass of an animal to disappear in the wild.

These type of photo's can appear gruesome and finding a carcass like this in the middle of a deep, dark wood can be quite eerie, especially if the carcass appears relatively fresh. Quite recently I investigated a sheep carcss in the Rokvencden area, after a lady walking her dog had seen an enormous black cat walk into the churchyard in the village. The next day the woman found a carcass - all that was left was the skull and the spine, the ribs has been sheared off and scavengers had done the rest. In 1998 I found a carcass of a goat in a relatively built up area on the outskirts of Rochester. The goat had been licked clean and birds had taken the eyes. A large cat often stalks its prey, and will sit in an area, iften away from the flock before making its move. Sheep are sometimes carried to the edge of a field and eaten. I'm sure that if sheep could talk they'd have some pretty scary experiences to speak of!

This photo shows a ram kill in Sussex, it was taken by a farmer named Graham Bennett. He'd been losing a couple of rams a week for around five months!

 

 I have hundreds of similar photo's to this, some of small dogs, others domestic cats, deer, etc and they are all killed in the same way. When dogs attack they can be extremely spiteful, biting the face, the legs, and will rarely eat a sheep, and scavengers tend to pluck bits from the carcass afterwards. In Paddock Wood a few years ago a farmer found most of his flock had been mauled - this had been the work of dogs. The faces of the sheep had been bitten but the carcasses remained untouched elsewhere. 

 

 The next blog will look at other evidence such as 'scat' (faeces), and paw prints.

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Categories: Animals | Big cats | Big cats, folklore, | Blue Bell Hill

What exotic cats roam Britain ?

by Big cat sightings in Kent, by Neil Arnold Wednesday, February 1 2012

Good afternoon and welcome to the second instalment of my new blog pertaining to my research into sightings and evidence of so-called 'big cats' in the south-east. As I mentioned in my first report, there are numerous issues, subjects, questions etc to get through and will, step by step, take you, dear reader into this intriguing situation which has been taking place for many years across the UK. The possibility that large, exotic cats roam south-eastern England has been a bugbear for many sceptics over the years. Those who remain unconvinced of the shaky film footage and blurry paw-print casts have every right to question something for which there appears no evidence for, but hopefully this blog will explain many of the mysteries and fill in the holes that seem to pepper this subject. Today, I'll be introducing you to the species of cat which are believed to roam not just Kent, but most of Britain. Hopefully, this introduction will make many people aware of not just what roams the countryside, but which animals do not. Over the years there have been reports of lions, tigers, cheetahs, and jaguars in the wilds of Kent, but NONE of these inhabit the local woods, in fact it would be absurd to suggest so, and I doubt very much whether such animals would roam any part of the UK. Nearly every sighting of a so-called lion, lioness et al, has been unfounded, and those that turn out to be genuine simply take place after an animal has escaped a zoo - resulting in it being recaptured or sadly, shot dead. In 2011 an alleged 'white toger' sighting took place elsewhere in the country, but the animal turned out to be cuddly toy, and yet police still investigated the sighting!! In the 1960s the Surrey puma flap of sightings originally involved witnesses coming forward to describe lioness sightings - when in fact a majority of witnesses were seeing a puma, also known as mountain lion and cougar, but what we must remember is that despite the thousands of 'big cat' sightings that take place, not every witness is genuine and not all know their species of cat. In London in 1994 a creature known as the 'Winchmore Hill lioness' hit the headlines, this was a decade after the 'Edgware tiger' scare. It's amazing what type of stories make the national headlines!

What we must remember is that whilst lions were purchased quite regularly in the 1960s as novel pets - this very large cat, native to  Africa, would stick out like a sore thumb in the UK wilds. Such an animal would be heard roaring, would seek very large prey and the lion is also a social animal that seeks a pride. Tigers 9which inhabit most of southern Asia) were not regularly kept as pets in the '60s, although in parts of the United States today it is believed that more people own Bengal tigers than there are Bengal tigers in the wild!! Again, a tiger is a very large cat, it's coat is very distinctive and there would be an alarming pile up of prey. The cheetah - this extremely agile and speedy cat which inhabits an area south of the Sahara in Africa, North Africa and the Middle East - was occasionally kept as a pet in the '60s. In India the father of the Moghul Emperor Jahangir was said to have kept more than one-thousand cheetahs! There is no evidence, despite legends, to suggest that the cheetah inhabits the south-east of England. Again, during the 1960s, when the Surrey puma legend began, there was rumour of a creature dubbed the 'Shooters Hill cheetah' even though no-one described seeing such a beast!! It's truly amazing how headlines come about! Another animal highly unlikely to inhabit Kent, Sussex, London outskirts and Surrey, is the jaguar. Those not in the know may confuse such a felid with the leopard in the sense that its coat is straw/yellow coloured and patched with dark rosettes. The jaguar, however, which is a stockier animal than the leopard, inhabits parts of the South and Central America. Both the leopard and the jaguar are prone to melanism - meaning both species can have a dark pigment to the coat - from a distance the animal appears black but up close the rosettes can be seen bleeding through the extremely dark coat. When the jaguar and leopard have dark pelage, people call them 'panthers', but the term 'panther' is simply folkloric and not a species of cat. In other words, a 'panther' is the melanistic (darker coated) form of the leopard or jaguar. The term 'panther' stems from the species classification, for the jaguar it being Panthera once, and for the leopard, Panthera pardus. The rosettes of the jaguar and leopard differ from one another. Within the rosette of a jaguar can be seen a dotted pattern. The jaguar also has shorter legs. Those who have seen the Disney movie The Jungle Book can now be made aware that the large black cat - Bagheera - is not a 'panther', but in fact a melanistic form of the Indian leopard.

Considering the thousands of reports of so-called 'big cats' I've received over the years, I have never received a report of a jaguar.

One detail of the British 'big cat' situation which often confuses people is the frequent use of the term 'big cat' which often suggests to many that the animals roaming the UK must surely be lion, tiger, jaguar, cheetah, but this is not the case. If a majority of these animals were on the loose in Kent, there would be cause for alarm. The only so-called 'big cat' to roam the UK is the leopard. The cat species which have the ability to roar are considered 'big cats, and produce cubs, the smaller cats purr - the puma emits an intense scream - and these cats produce kittens. The remaining cats which are alleged to inhabit the UK are the puma, lynx and jungle cat. Let's look at these cats:

Leopard - If you've ever had the fortune to see a leopard on the television, or in the flesh at a zoo or on safari in Africa, you will immediately recognise this 'big cat', which also inhabits parts of Asia, is recognisable by its yellowy-type coat, and its magnificent rosette pattern. The leopard can grow to around 7-ft in length and stand over 2-ft at the shoulder. An individual can weigh from anywhere between 80 and 180 lb. A genetic mutation results in the 'panther' - the melanistic leopard. Strangely, in the south-east of England I have never received a report of a 'normal' leopard, every sighting has describe the darker form. Although two spotted parents can produce a mixed litter, black parents only produce black offspring, due to the recessive gene.

The leopard is an adept climber - the next time you are walking through your local woods, always be sure to look up into the trees - a leopard can easily climba  tree, not only to sleep, but will stash its prey in the lower branches. Its ability to climb trees means the leopard is the perfect hunter and the acting of chaching in trees means that scavengers such as jackals, hyenas, and in the UK, foxes, cannot steal a kill.

The leopard can have a vast territory, stretching several hundred square miles - looking for a leopard in England is something akin to searching for a needle in a haystack. The leopard mainly hunts at night, and hunts with supreme stealth. The animal emits a variety of noises from a double-barrelled growl, to a deep,swa cough and a warning hiss. Despite their elusive nature, in parts of their native country the leopard is happy to hunt within a few miles of a big city, making it suited to human encroachment. The solitary male could have a territory that encompasses a couple of females. When a male and female copulate, between 1-4 (usually 2)cubs are born. The male often leaves the litter and the cubs stay with the mother for around 18 months before making their own way in life. Inbreeding will stunt the population.

In the 1960s it was relatively common for people to keep leopards - and often the sleek, black variety, as pets. Documented evidence proves this. Even today the darker form of the leopard is considered an iconic animal representing the cool, sexy, suave and sophisticated, and often these animals can still be seen in music video's and advertisements.

Each year I receive between 150 and 250 eye-witness reports of exotic cats across the south-east. More than half of this number are attributed to large black cats. Witnesses, when seeing such animals - even from a distance - notice how long the tail is. The tail of a leopard is unlike a domestic cat - it can measure almost three-quarters the length of the body and curves down behind it in an 'S' shape.

Puma (aka Mountain lion, cougar): If you look on the internet, or in books or newspaper archives in reference to British 'big cats' sightings, you'll be stunned at the naivety when it comes to identifying species of exotic cats. During the 1960s, a time when it was popular to keep a large cat as a pet - newspapers and witnesses alike were describing so many differing species of cats with varying coat colours that confusion was rife. The press would often talk about sightings of a black (melanistic) puma. The puma is never black. Melanism is extremely rare in this cat, but even the darkest form of such a cat, would still a lighter underside. The puma (Felis concolor) is native to certain areas of the United States and Canada. Despite measuring up to 7-ft in length, it is not a 'big cat', for it cannot roar. The puma is the largest of the Lesser Cats, and emits a piercing, eerie cry which can travel for miles - ideal for communication between individuals. The puma, like the leopard, also a long curving tail, its head is relatively small compared to the rest of the body and the coat is uniformly buff coloured. The tail has a black tip. The puma, like the leopard, prefers to hunt prey rather than scavenge. The young of the puma have spots, which fade with maturity. In its country of origin the puma is considered such an elusive animal that it has been bestowed folkloric names such as 'ghost cat' and 'shadow cat'. In some states it has been declared extinct, as human encroachment has forced it back into the deep woods, and yet despite being declared extinct the animal keeps on showing up - and much to the annoyance of the wildlife departments who state categorically that sightings must be misidentifications or escapees.

During the 1960s the puma - which is considered a New World cat - was housed in many private collections across England. In the 1970s a London man walked into his pub with his pet puma on a lead. Another man had his puma destroyed when it attacked his young son. These are not unique cases - the puma was the ideal cat to keep, especially if it was a young - seemingly cute and cuddly individual.

The puma is often reported throughout the south-east of England, but a puma at a distance in daylight is far less conspicious than a black leopard. Its coat can range from the uniform buff to silvery grey and a reddish tan. From a distance someone who sights such a cat may think they are seeing a deer or fox. The puma is the second largest cat to be sighted in the UK.

In its native habitat the puma has been known to attack humans. People cycling through the trees, children running and playing, and also joggers have become prey. Some claim that most attacks take place due to the cat having rabies or being starved due to lack of prey in its area. In Africa and India the leopard tends to only attack humans who live in remote villages which infringe on forest.

Lynx The Eurasian lynx (Felis lynx) is a very interesting animal in that a few thousand years ago it was native to Britain. Some researchers argue that the lynx never fully died out and due to its elusive nature and wide distribution it may well have hung on in the more dense forest areas of the UK. The lynx is mainly identifiable by the fact it has a short stubby tail, large tufted ears and a mottled coat which can range from yellowish, brown, greyish, reddish and silvery. Nowadays the Eurasian lynx inhabits North Europe and Asia, whereas the Iberian lynx dwells in S.W. Europe - the Iberian lynx is smaller than the Euasian lynx. The similar-looking Bobcat inhabits the southern region of the Canadian provinces and the United States and into Mexico. Another similar-looking felid is the caracal, which inhabits Africa. The caracal is smaller than the lynx, has a reddish-rusty coat, and has distinctive tufted ears .

Lynx were most certainly kept as pets, not only in the 1960s, but also during the Victorian era when travelling menageries and private collections were all the rage - which will be discussed in another post. Bizarrely, in 2001 a lynx was found cowering in a back garden in North London. A female witness reported it to the police who with the help of London Zoo darted the animal. No-one to this day knows where the animal came from - no-one came forward to say they'd lost a lynx - which they had probably been keeping illegally.

So, the leopard, puma and lynx are the main three species of cat said to roam the south-east of England, pretty much the rest of the UK. It may be a wild statement for me to make, but again, before you dismiss such reports, please bear with this blog so as to present the evidence for these animals existing in our woods.

There has also, in the past, been occasional reports of other smaller cats, such as jaguarundi, golden cat, jungle cat, ocelot, lserval and leopard cat. These animals certainly wouldn't be a major problem for people to keep as pets, although there aren't many records of anyone keeping the golden cat. The golden cat inhabits Africa and Asia, and is prone to melanism. The African golden cat is twice the size of a domestic cat has a coat which ranges from grey to red-brown and sometimes has spots. The Asian variety - known as Temmick's cat has some similarities to the Africa golden cat in that the coat varies, and melanism occurs. One cat which most certainly has been sighted in the UK is the Jungle Cat, also known as the Swamp cat and Reed Cat, which inhabits parts of Africa and Asia. The Jungle Cat, among a few other smaller species of cat, were used aboard boats for 'ratting'. The Jungle cat grows to just over 2-ft in length, has relatively long legs, at times a banded tail, and a light brown coat. The UK would be perfect for such a cat in that it hunts rodents, birds and reptiles. Specimens have been killed in Shropshire and Essex. A leopard cat was shot dead on the Isle of Wight a few decades ago and the serval and ocelot have been known to escape zoo parks. The jaguarundi probably does not inhabit the woods of Britain. This cat, native to south America looks more like a mustelid - a class of mammal which contains the stoat, European polecat, mink, Eurasian badger, wolverine, pine marten etc. Other cats which do not inhabit the UK are the clouded leopard and snow leopard (in the '80s a clouded leopard was shot in Kent but it had been a zoo escapee) and the rarer cats such as sand cat, marbled cat, pallas cat, andean cat, flat-headed cat etc. Interestingly, in the March of 2011 a rare Amur leopard cat was found in a back garden near London and handed in to Heathrow Pet Centre! Such incidents do not suggest we have established numbers but instead an escaped pet.

Despite the many reports across the UK of the above mentioned species, the UK is NOT running alive with thousands of exotic cats, but there must be small pockets of viable populations. There is no evidence of bizarre mutations such as leopard x puma, etc, although in zoo parks cross-breeding occurs, these animals are generally regarded as freaks, i.e. leopards, ligers etc, and do not occur in the wild. One vital detail that must be looked at in regards to monitoring sightings of exotic cats in the UK is consistency. A majority of witneses describe a large, Alsatian-sized seemingly jet-black cat - the black leopard, as well as a slightly smaller buff-coloured, long tailed cat - the puma, and a smaller still, tufted eared bobbed tail cat - the lynx. Reports, as stated earlier, of white tigers, lions, cheetahs, etc are unfounded and can only be taken seriously if they are consistently reported. So, before the sceptics go claiming that I said there are monstrous, mutant big cats on the loose - think again. Eye witness reports are deemed credible when they involve police officers, government officials and the like, but are often scoffed at when sightings are merely reported by general members of the public, but not everyone has just come out of the pub, is seeking attention, hoaxing or lying.

And finally, for this blog, I'd like to add that it's very important to remember that cats such as leopard, puma etc, in the wild, live for between 10 and 14 years, and longer in captivity. It is clear - and judging by reports - that female and male leopards are meeting up and breeding, and producing enough young to support a healthy population. It is unlikely however that a male leopard in Kent is meeting up with a female in Scotland - research suggests the territory for a male leopard in England ranges from 30 to 100 square miles. A leopard does not have a fixed den, and will zig-zag across a territory, staying in an area where there is food before only gradually moving on. The leopard scent marks its range. Of a night the leopard hunts with stealth, sightings usually occur when someone is driving late at night or during the early hours of the morning, or sightings involve people wlking their dogs or fishing. And sightings often last under three seconds. A leopard will happily, during the day, bask in the sun, snooze under a tree, lay up in an old churchyard, but we need to remember, these are the most elusive animals on earth. And they can smell, see and hear humans from quite a distance. A black leopard in the darkness may only be visible by its eye reflection, whereas a puma can melt into the shadows of daylight like a ghost. They stick to rocky outcrops, hedgerows, tree-lines, dense forest, quarries etc. Of a night an ideal place for a leopard to prowl is a golf course - prey is abundant and there would be no people. A railway line is perfect for navigation - of a night a railway line provides excellent cover enabling a large cat to slink into back gardens, and alongside a railway line there is plenty of prey. And, before anyone starts claiming that there is no prey in the UK for a leopard and that there should be piles of slaughtered animals (as one 'expert' zoo keeper stated)...hopefully the next blog will prove otherwise.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Categories: Animals | Big cats | Big cats, folklore,

Got a bee in your bonnet?

Bloggy BeeIf you have a voice, and would like it to be heard, why not consider writing a blog for our site?

Click here to send us a message and let us know!

Welcome to our blogs!

Our Blogs

Tag cloud

Topics of Conversation